Dumb beaner award! Lmao at the ending citing Bible verses that you are the one in violation of it, in defense of the people who killed God, although since you only used OT verses one could assume you're Jewish and at least then it's understandable why you religiously worship the Hololocaust. Listing a bunch of unacademic and/or Jewish sources that you haven't read/studied doesn't actually debooonk WW2 revisionism, even then you only actually addressed Hololocaust denial. It's 2025, you might reinforce Boomers in their geriatric delusion, but against any of the young you haven't a chance to lie to.
Attacking the origin of the source rather than the claims, classic genetic fallacy. Also claiming he is Jewish without evidence is a form of lying and bearing false witness. Attacking the person over the argument shows your weakness. And it makes you look foolish. So congrats you get an award for ignorance.
Why do you pretend to be Christian? You can not serve two masters, the Jews who killed Jesus and Jesus himself.
1. He's a beaner, not my fault.
2. I provided the evidence in the comment goofball, he only quotes the old testament and religiously worships Jews, even then I merely suggested it as a possibility despite that being a strong set of evidence.
3. Attacking the person is standard in Holocaust academia, ex Lipadst attacked Irving's character (and her defense team mocked his daughter's suicide during the trial) and he uses her as a source that he obviously did not read or look into otherwise he would know not to use her. However what argument of his am I supposed to address? He doesn't provide one he hides behind sources he didn't read. Shall I go into extreme detail knowing full well he will ignore the argument against his sentence claims and tear the sources he hasn't read? Am I to pretend that this did anything to deboonk Holocaust denial? He doesn't even address WW2 revisionism.
2. You provided no evidence other than him using OT verses. And why is that a problem? Scripture is inspired and the writers of the New Testament quoted it (Romans 15:4; 2nd Timothy 3:16-17).
3. Once again you accuse people of personally attacking and turn and do the same, you simply dismiss the sources rather provide substance .
4. God knows who are his (2nd Timothy 2:19) and its good that you're not him.
1. I don't live in fairy world, I understand that people are a reflection of their genes and culture, and again there is zero argument for me to address.
2. If he's a Christian why does he not use New Testament scripture? The answer is that he's not and he rejects that God himself was killed by the Jews who worship the Devil as explicitly and clearly laid out in the New Testament.
3. This is retarded, Deborah Lipsadt slandered Irving and her legal team was indisputably corrupt. Since he is not using her arguments (which was that Irving hated Jews) I can't address them but I can address that she's a liar. As are several other of his sources like HitlerHatedChrist whom I have proven to be a liar previously, yet this Jew worshipper pretends such an oaf is a source of anything. You can not complain about pointing out the problems of a source if your source did the same thing but dishonestly. If I sourced Hitler himself I know you'd reject him as a source, whether you lie and claim otherwise or not.
4. Both myself and Hitler are more Christian than you will ever be short of a divine miracle. In fact I'm not humoring this, it is 2025 and unless you're a boomer or Jewish there is no excuse to pretend you can worship the Hololocaust and be Christian anymore, you disgrace God with your enslaved tongue and your heart has rejected the way, the TRUTH, and the life.
1. Once again his ethnicity has no bearing on the arguement. So if a non-white person says 2+2=4 are you going to reject it?
2. So you reject the Old Testament as inspired even though the writers did not and quoted it. So you hold to the theology of Marcion.
3. Just more name calling and insults.
4. A Christian is known by the fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23), prays for their enemies (Matthew 5:44). Murder is not in the spirit of Christ (Galatians 5:21). Also no one is worshiping the holocaust that's a false accusation.
1. Yeah it does, it's 2025 guy, the old lies are dead. No, but he claims 2+2=5.
2. No, but he can't quote the NT because it shows he's a slave to devil worshippers or is one himself.
3. Insane, positively insane, the trial was on slandering Irving's character, pointing out what happened in the trial being cited is completely acceptable as is pointing out a source is unreliable. "You can't name call my source that did nothing but name call (and bribe)."
4. Correct, so Hitler passes as he wanted peace and was Catholic unlike the Satanic allies who all declared war first and refused peace. You openly worship the Hololocaust, lmao at pretending you don't. Who do you think you will convince when you so openly do? Certainly not Jesus Christ and certainly not someone who believes in the Bible, of course neither matter to you.
Firstly, resorting to racial slurs is always odd, because in your worldview apparently only white people can argue about history.
Secondly, blaming the entire Jewish race for “killing god” is just peak retardation. None of us have anything to do with the high priests of Israel 2 millennia ago.
Thirdly, using OT verses doesn’t equate Jewishness whatsoever. And the fact that you’re so desperate for a rebuttal that you just pull randoms out of your ass like blaming him as Jewish 8/ just even more pathetic.
Fourthly, attacking the origin of the source is what we call a genetic fallacy. You don’t get to just push away any evidence you don’t like because it’s “Jewish”.
Fifth, the sources Javier used as far from “unacademic”. Most anti-revisionist scholars have phds, have done extensive research and collaborate with other scholars. Ironic you say this really, because most deniers have a massive problem with using false credentials and not having any credentials like Leuchter or Rudolf. The projection is insane here lmao.
Sixth, “you won’t have a chance to lie to the young”. Bro, all you did was ignore the entire article, run to the comments and start yammering about how he’s Jewish and whatnot. Oh boy, if you think boomers are deluded, the future generations with the “young” taking power are absolutely screwed.
Neo-nazis and their pre-programmed responses whenever their bullshit is debunked. Never gets old. Let me guess, up next is “good goy”? Or maybe “you’re jewish”? Am i right?
The problems remains for you too though. You also confess that your Germans neighbors lied about the threat of the soviets and justify allying with the soviets though they killed as many or more in the same ways. Either way, I don’t have an opinion on the matter, but there is no divinely revealed truth on this matter. And if we condemn people for thinking some violence was justified then we must condemn ourselves for allying with evil
Great stuff
Very good work, thank you
Legendary work, man. I did my own version of this here. Please feel free to pillage any resources that you might find of value.
https://willspencerpod.substack.com/p/defeating-holocaust-denialism
How did I not see your article before!? Great stuff, brother.
Maybe because I didn’t tag you in it as I should have? I have your OG video in it. And have added a link to your new Substack post.
Dumb beaner award! Lmao at the ending citing Bible verses that you are the one in violation of it, in defense of the people who killed God, although since you only used OT verses one could assume you're Jewish and at least then it's understandable why you religiously worship the Hololocaust. Listing a bunch of unacademic and/or Jewish sources that you haven't read/studied doesn't actually debooonk WW2 revisionism, even then you only actually addressed Hololocaust denial. It's 2025, you might reinforce Boomers in their geriatric delusion, but against any of the young you haven't a chance to lie to.
Attacking the origin of the source rather than the claims, classic genetic fallacy. Also claiming he is Jewish without evidence is a form of lying and bearing false witness. Attacking the person over the argument shows your weakness. And it makes you look foolish. So congrats you get an award for ignorance.
Why do you pretend to be Christian? You can not serve two masters, the Jews who killed Jesus and Jesus himself.
1. He's a beaner, not my fault.
2. I provided the evidence in the comment goofball, he only quotes the old testament and religiously worships Jews, even then I merely suggested it as a possibility despite that being a strong set of evidence.
3. Attacking the person is standard in Holocaust academia, ex Lipadst attacked Irving's character (and her defense team mocked his daughter's suicide during the trial) and he uses her as a source that he obviously did not read or look into otherwise he would know not to use her. However what argument of his am I supposed to address? He doesn't provide one he hides behind sources he didn't read. Shall I go into extreme detail knowing full well he will ignore the argument against his sentence claims and tear the sources he hasn't read? Am I to pretend that this did anything to deboonk Holocaust denial? He doesn't even address WW2 revisionism.
4. Predestined to reject Christ award.
1. Again another personal attack
2. You provided no evidence other than him using OT verses. And why is that a problem? Scripture is inspired and the writers of the New Testament quoted it (Romans 15:4; 2nd Timothy 3:16-17).
3. Once again you accuse people of personally attacking and turn and do the same, you simply dismiss the sources rather provide substance .
4. God knows who are his (2nd Timothy 2:19) and its good that you're not him.
1. I don't live in fairy world, I understand that people are a reflection of their genes and culture, and again there is zero argument for me to address.
2. If he's a Christian why does he not use New Testament scripture? The answer is that he's not and he rejects that God himself was killed by the Jews who worship the Devil as explicitly and clearly laid out in the New Testament.
3. This is retarded, Deborah Lipsadt slandered Irving and her legal team was indisputably corrupt. Since he is not using her arguments (which was that Irving hated Jews) I can't address them but I can address that she's a liar. As are several other of his sources like HitlerHatedChrist whom I have proven to be a liar previously, yet this Jew worshipper pretends such an oaf is a source of anything. You can not complain about pointing out the problems of a source if your source did the same thing but dishonestly. If I sourced Hitler himself I know you'd reject him as a source, whether you lie and claim otherwise or not.
4. Both myself and Hitler are more Christian than you will ever be short of a divine miracle. In fact I'm not humoring this, it is 2025 and unless you're a boomer or Jewish there is no excuse to pretend you can worship the Hololocaust and be Christian anymore, you disgrace God with your enslaved tongue and your heart has rejected the way, the TRUTH, and the life.
1. Once again his ethnicity has no bearing on the arguement. So if a non-white person says 2+2=4 are you going to reject it?
2. So you reject the Old Testament as inspired even though the writers did not and quoted it. So you hold to the theology of Marcion.
3. Just more name calling and insults.
4. A Christian is known by the fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23), prays for their enemies (Matthew 5:44). Murder is not in the spirit of Christ (Galatians 5:21). Also no one is worshiping the holocaust that's a false accusation.
1. Yeah it does, it's 2025 guy, the old lies are dead. No, but he claims 2+2=5.
2. No, but he can't quote the NT because it shows he's a slave to devil worshippers or is one himself.
3. Insane, positively insane, the trial was on slandering Irving's character, pointing out what happened in the trial being cited is completely acceptable as is pointing out a source is unreliable. "You can't name call my source that did nothing but name call (and bribe)."
4. Correct, so Hitler passes as he wanted peace and was Catholic unlike the Satanic allies who all declared war first and refused peace. You openly worship the Hololocaust, lmao at pretending you don't. Who do you think you will convince when you so openly do? Certainly not Jesus Christ and certainly not someone who believes in the Bible, of course neither matter to you.
You said a whole lot of nothing here.
Firstly, resorting to racial slurs is always odd, because in your worldview apparently only white people can argue about history.
Secondly, blaming the entire Jewish race for “killing god” is just peak retardation. None of us have anything to do with the high priests of Israel 2 millennia ago.
Thirdly, using OT verses doesn’t equate Jewishness whatsoever. And the fact that you’re so desperate for a rebuttal that you just pull randoms out of your ass like blaming him as Jewish 8/ just even more pathetic.
Fourthly, attacking the origin of the source is what we call a genetic fallacy. You don’t get to just push away any evidence you don’t like because it’s “Jewish”.
Fifth, the sources Javier used as far from “unacademic”. Most anti-revisionist scholars have phds, have done extensive research and collaborate with other scholars. Ironic you say this really, because most deniers have a massive problem with using false credentials and not having any credentials like Leuchter or Rudolf. The projection is insane here lmao.
Sixth, “you won’t have a chance to lie to the young”. Bro, all you did was ignore the entire article, run to the comments and start yammering about how he’s Jewish and whatnot. Oh boy, if you think boomers are deluded, the future generations with the “young” taking power are absolutely screwed.
Too late. The goyim know.
Neo-nazis and their pre-programmed responses whenever their bullshit is debunked. Never gets old. Let me guess, up next is “good goy”? Or maybe “you’re jewish”? Am i right?
Deboonk me, baby ha ha
The problems remains for you too though. You also confess that your Germans neighbors lied about the threat of the soviets and justify allying with the soviets though they killed as many or more in the same ways. Either way, I don’t have an opinion on the matter, but there is no divinely revealed truth on this matter. And if we condemn people for thinking some violence was justified then we must condemn ourselves for allying with evil
Heads up: Your video with Dr. Weikart does not appear.
Fixed it! Thanks for the heads up.
Also add Hitler, the Holocaust, and the Bible- Joseph Keysor